Comparing two leading open-source vector database solutions in 2025
Feature-rich vector database platform
Best for:
Teams needing GraphQL and multi-modal search capabilities
High-performance vector database
Best for:
Teams prioritizing performance and advanced filtering
Choose Weaviate if you need:
Choose Qdrant if you need:
Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Primary API | GraphQL, REST | REST, gRPC |
Query Performance | 10-50ms | 5-20ms |
Filtering Speed | Good | Excellent |
Resource Usage | 8GB+ RAM | 4GB+ RAM |
Multi-modal Support | Built-in | Manual |
Clustering | Yes | Yes |
Learning Curve | Steeper | Moderate |
Community Size | Large | Growing |
Weaviate uses a schema-based approach with classes and properties, similar to traditional databases but optimized for vectors.
Key Insight: Weaviate prioritizes flexibility and features over raw performance.
Qdrant focuses on high-performance vector search with advanced filtering, optimizing every component for speed.
Key Insight: Qdrant optimizes for performance and filtering efficiency.
Note: Qdrant is 2-3x faster and uses 40% less memory, but Weaviate offers more features.
Weaviate
Good filtering with GraphQL flexibility, but slower on complex filters
Qdrant
Excellent filtering performance, optimized for complex boolean queries
Weaviate
Native support with built-in modules for text, image, and more
Qdrant
Requires manual implementation and multiple collections
Scale | Weaviate | Qdrant |
---|---|---|
Development (100K vectors) | $0 (local) | $0 (local) |
Small (1M vectors) | $200/mo | $100/mo |
Medium (10M vectors) | $800/mo | $400/mo |
Large (100M vectors) | $3K/mo | $1.5K/mo |
Enterprise (1B+ vectors) | Weaviate Enterprise | Qdrant Cloud |
For Weaviate:
For Qdrant:
import weaviate client = weaviate.Client("http://localhost:8080") # Define schema schema = { "class": "Product", "properties": [{ "name": "title", "dataType": ["text"] }, { "name": "price", "dataType": ["number"] }] } client.schema.create_class(schema) # GraphQL query with filters result = client.query.get("Product", ["title", "price"]) .with_near_vector({"vector": query_vector}) .with_where({ "path": ["price"], "operator": "GreaterThan", "valueNumber": 50 }) .with_limit(10) .do()
from qdrant_client import QdrantClient from qdrant_client.models import VectorParams, Distance client = QdrantClient("localhost", port=6333) # Create collection client.create_collection( collection_name="products", vectors_config=VectorParams(size=768, distance=Distance.COSINE) ) # Search with filters results = client.search( collection_name="products", query_vector=query_vector, query_filter={ "must": [{ "key": "price", "range": {"gte": 50} }] }, limit=10 )
Content platform with text, images, and videos:
Weaviate's modules make this easy
Semantic search with relationships:
Perfect fit for Weaviate's design
Low-latency search service:
Qdrant's performance wins
Edge deployment or limited resources:
Qdrant's efficiency is key
When you need better performance and filtering:
When you need GraphQL or multi-modal features:
⚠️ Important: Both use HNSW indexing, making data migration straightforward.
Requirement | Recommended | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
GraphQL API needed | Weaviate | Native GraphQL support |
Maximum performance | Qdrant | 2-3x faster queries |
Multi-modal search | Weaviate | Built-in modules |
Advanced filtering | Qdrant | Superior filter performance |
Low resource usage | Qdrant | 40% less memory |
Built-in vectorizers | Weaviate | Module ecosystem |
Simple deployment | Qdrant | Less configuration |
Weaviate excels as a comprehensive vector database platform with GraphQL, multi-modal search, and a rich module ecosystem. It's the better choice when you need advanced features and don't mind trading some performance for flexibility.
Bottom Line: Choose Weaviate for feature-rich applications with complex requirements.
Qdrant wins on performance, resource efficiency, and filtering capabilities. Its simpler architecture and focused design make it ideal for teams that prioritize speed and efficiency over extensive features.
Bottom Line: Choose Qdrant for high-performance applications with filtering needs.
Both are excellent choices. Choose Weaviate if you need GraphQL, multi-modal search, or built-in vectorization. Choose Qdrant if performance, resource efficiency, and advanced filtering are your priorities. Consider your specific requirements rather than following generic advice.
Our experts can help you implement the right vector database solution for your specific use case.